Answer: May face Title VII liability if it gives Cody a positive performance evaluation and then later terminates him for poor job performance. The factors need to stand alone and not overlap. The evaluation is requested as a means to reward high performance in the job. This method is best suited to a small company without too complex a structure. This site teaches … is a time-consuming process. Evaluation of clerical, technical, professional and supervisory jobs handled more or less on the principles that are used in evaluating manual or factory jobs. The structure should correspond with rewards for the values, skills, and qualities that you value in your employees. Its findings will be the underpinning for the entire job evaluation process. Grade levels increase in relation to the variety of issues and activities, and to the difficulty of the problems and decisions dealt with. The committee then allocated Dollar 350 to mental effort, Dollar 450 for skill, Dollar 100 for physical effort, Dollar 250 to responsibility and 150 for working conditions. The assignment of point values indicates not only which job is worth more than another, but how much more it is worth. Selecting a number of keys- jobs in the organization as standards. 03 Oct 2018 | Owain Simpson, Content Writer. To give a straight definition, it's the procedure of weighing up an employee's role and orientating it in the wider company structure. It's important to focus on getting this right for a couple of reasons. Sometimes, other factors like government policy may dominate the job evaluation The results of job evaluation may not … The method’s problem is it is too broad in its classification of jobs. It does not directly determine pay levels, but will establish the basis for an internal ranking of jobs. It takes into account all the factors that a job comprises. Specifically it means job … If you get it right, however, a whole host of good PR and opportunities to boost the image of your company as forward thinking and fair, with good values. The use of fixed and predetermined factors forces the raters to consider the same job elements when rating jobs. This method is best for large companies with large and diverse teams. This is considered the most reliable method and is also the most widely used. It is important to offer insightful and constructive feedback in the evaluation to ensure your team members remain motivated and continue to develop valuable skills. Job evaluation is an assessment of the relative worth of various jobs on the basis of a consistent set of job and personal factors, such as qualifications and skills required. 10 steps to developing a successful job evaluation 1. Thus, according to this system, the clerks may be put into one class, supervisors in a higher class and higher executives on the top class. Writing grade or class descriptions is not easy in this method. It is worthwhile noting which ones are used most commonly in your sector. Thomas E. Hitten was the first to originate factor comparison method of job evaluation. Complexity refers to the variety and relative difficulty of the material or information upon which decisions are based. The use of the five factors is the growth of the technique developed by its organizations. These are systematic and formalised systems for evaluating jobs. For example, Figure I shows that the factor of responsibility can be broken down into the safety of others, equipment, and materials, assisting trainee and product quality. The objective of job evaluation is to determine which jobs should get more pay than others… The sub-factors of each key job must be given relative ranks, based on their individual contribution to the total job. Job grading or job classification is slightly more sophisticated than job ranking, but still not very precise. Accurately describing an employee’s abilities to maintain performance levels and set priorities helps the employee to shape goals after the appraisal process is complete. So, Job … This system requires six steps and is usually implemented by a job evaluation committee or an individual analyst. Market pricing is the process for determining the external value of jobs, allowing the manager to establish wage and salary structures and pay rates that are market sensitive. There are a number of job evaluation methods to choose from. You might need to ask yourself if you are being too subjective with your expectations. Analysts then develop a point manual that contains a written explanation of each job element. You can develop your teams, your employees, and their skills and experience, and incentivise each to develop themselves, by really shouting about the message that your pay structure sends. Content validity A test-validation strategy … Another drawback is subjectivity, as there are no definite or consistent standards by which to justify the rankings and the fact that because jobs are only ranked in terms of the order, we have no knowledge of the distance between the ranks. The system results in more accurate job evaluation because weights are not selected arbitrarily. It is essential that this task is done well and analytically, without being vague. A compensable factor is one used to identify a job value that is commonly present throughout a group of jobs. To illustrate, in one organization the job of maintenance electrician was chosen as a key job and had an hourly rate of Dollar 1300.00. Jobs may change over time, but the rating scales established under the point method remain unaffected. This method is quantitative as each of the compensable factors is assigned a numerical value. Basically, a company will set up a pre-determined number of classifications, for instance, three classifications: low-skilled, high-skilled and executive. This will be due to a failure in one of the three aspects from above, either the job analysis, the factor and sub-factor definition or finally in the assessment of the job against the factors. The factor comparison method permits a more systematic comparison of jobs than the non-analytical methods. A criterion-related validity study that seeks to establish an empirical relationship between applicants' test scores and their eventual performance on the job. Job evaluations are not intended as a vehicle to promote or reward people who perform well in their job, if their job … Job evaluation is only one among several factors in deterring the wage level. Judgment refers to the use of knowledge and experience in making the decisions. Key jobs are jobs that are commonly found throughout the organization and in the labor market. The factors you choose should be evident in lesser or greater degrees across the majority of roles in your company. The job evaluation committee subjectively assigns the maximum possible points to each sub-factor. The point method is more sophisticated than the ranking and classification methods. This technique does not consider all the sub-factors as the operation of the system would be difficult if it considers all the factors. The two most common methods of job evaluation that have been used are first, whole job ranking, where jobs are taken as a whole and ranked against each other. These factors are the job elements common to all the jobs being evaluated. Jobs within the organization are arranged in some order from the most difficult to the simplest or in the reversed order. A wage survey is usually undertaken to collect wage rates of certain key jobs in the organization. On the basis of job analysis, each member of the job evaluation committee ranks each job independently either against the benchmark job or against all other jobs. Each class or grade is assigned a salary range with maximum and minimum limits. The committee appraises all other jobs and assigns a value on each factor by comparing them with key jobs. Firstly, a clear, rational pay structure and obvious progression helps your employees to understand what qualities and skills you value. Under this system, the job raters simply rank one job against another without assigning point values. ... As you read job … Given that you choose to use the Hay Method mentioned in the previous step, you need to choose the factors that you value most highly within the roles that you are evaluating. Finally, you can also represent your company as forward-thinking, fair and clear in its values. There are four widely used job evaluation methods. When this method is employed, the job rater simply compares two jobs, one against another and asks which of the two is more difficult. .The weights selected are not arbitrary but reflected existing wage and salary practice. That is, all other jobs with similar responsibilities were assigned Dollar 250 for that criterion. These are then split into sub-factors and ordered in terms of value to the company. Job evaluation is a process of determining the relative worth of a job. For example, if safety (100) is twice as important as assisting trainees (50), it gets as many points. STAGES IN THE JOB ANALYSIS PROCESS Understand the purpose of the job analysis Determine how to collect job analysis information Review draft with supervisor Develop draft Seek clarification Understand the role of job … Conducting an employee appraisal … Job evaluation is a practical technique, designed to enable trained and experienced staff to judge the size of one job relative to others. It utilizes a few factors and thereby reduces the likelihood of overlapping. This factor deals with the decision-making aspects of the position. This method is analytical in the sense that it breaks down jobs into various compensable factors and places weights or points on them. In the words of Dale Yoder “Job Evaluation is a practice which seeks to provide a degree of objectivity in measuring the comparative value of jobs within an organisation and among organisations.” It is essentially a job … Usually, the committee selects ten to fifteen key jobs. When the point matrix and manual are ready, the relative value of each job can be determined. The points rating system has many advantages over ranking and classification systems. It provides an opportunity for a systematic organizational structure. Although the outcome of job evaluation should be the same for any method the process might have to be adapted slightly for different methods at later stages. The reliability and validity of the system are greater than the same statistical measures obtained from group standardized job analysis plans. Register now. It uses the job-by-job comparison technique, which is a far more accurate method of measurement. This will also let your employees know what you want to reward. This stage might be seen as a problem spotting stage. It is more elaborate than the ranking method. You should endeavor to use it within HR development programs, recruitment drives and in PR to best show what you value and that you are thorough and fair in the way you reward employees. There may be four levels namely, minimum, low, moderate and high. Secondly, a clear career progression structure, as outlined by your compensation, will attract driven and motivated employees to your company as they will value the clarity with which you have outlined a path to success and being valued highly in the company. The Objective of Job Evaluation The purpose of conducting job evaluation is to fairly determine the monetary value / worth of a job in relation to other jobs in an organization. These are listed below: The point rating system is not without limitations. After the total points for each job are known, the jobs are ranked. Let’s explain this. Join our latest webinar to hear experts discuss what the pivotal HR movements will be in 2021 and how people leaders can make this year a success. The ranking method of job evaluation is generally used in small firms where all jobs are well -known. The use of the present wages of the key jobs may initially create errors in the plan. Methods of Job Evaluation Job-evaluation methods are of two categories:- a) Analytical Methods Point Ranking Methods Factor Comparison Method b) Non-analytical Methods Ranking Method Job-grading Method Non-analytical Methods Ranking and job-classification methods come under this category because they make no use of detailed job factors. Jobs are examined as a whole instead of individual factors. This process is repeated until all jobs have been assigned relative positions. It does not take a great deal of time and does not require technical help. The usual process followed in this method is as under: 1. The procedure of rating new jobs by comparing with other standards or key job is logical and not too difficult to accomplish. To determine what positions and job responsibilities are similar for purposes of pay, promotions, lateral moves, transfers, assignments and … Here is a clear step by step guide to undertaking a job evaluation that should help you on your way to providing a fair and equal pay structure that will benefit you in all of these ways. Definition: The Job Evaluation is the process of assessing the relative worth of the jobs in an organization. Each job in the organization is put into a class or grade according to the class description it matches best. QUESTION 3 Topic: Job Evaluation Test. The critical factors are skill effort, responsibility, experience, working condition, and these factors are broken down into sub-factors. The points for each sub-factor are added to find the total number of points for the job. To make sure the ranking and structure does this properly, it's a good idea to gather a team from across the spectrum of expertise and skillsets within your company to assess this. Once you've evaluated your job offer thoroughly, you will be in a much better position to judge whether you should take the job, try to negotiate a better deal, or reject the offer completely. Once that question has been settled, another job is compared against the first two and a similar determination is made. This gives you the relative worth of a job relative to the rest of the roles in your company which leads you to your pay structure. The factors should be as objective as possible and reflect the whole company’s preferences not simply your own. It begins with an overall classification of all jobs on the basis of common sense, skill, responsibilities, and experience. This is the step where you formalise the hierarchy of your pay structure and use it to highlight how individuals can develop over their careers by moving up through your pay structure. It considers the components of a job rather than the total job and is much more comprehensive than either ranking or classification method. You have invested significant resources in building the pay structure through your job evaluations so you need to optimise its effectiveness by using it. If you have successfully assessed the job, analysed its demands and requirements and set out good units of measurement with your factors, then this part is straightforward as each job you assess spits out a number the ranking should ‘take care of itself’. It does not measure the value of jobs but establishes their ranks only. It is a systematic and quantifiable method for which detailed step by step instructions are available. The main drawback of this system is that it can tell only that one job is more difficult than another without indicating how much difficult it is. For each class, a general description is written indicating the nature of work and responsibility that are included. Job Analysis is a comprehensive process while Job Evaluation is a … This ranking procedure is based on job descriptions and job specifications. There are obvious flaws in this system. It is a process which is helpful even for framing compensation plans by the personnel manager. It forces the raters to consider individual factors rather than the jobs as a whole. In spite of the above-mentioned merits, this method suffers from the following limitations: It sometimes seems to be arbitrary, though it takes the views of representatives of trade unions. You should always, at the end of your job evaluation make the pay structure clear to your employees and use it to develop your teams in the direction your company wants to go. The pay system is very easy to understand which is of benefit when communicating it to your employees and it also takes into account all aspects of the job before assigning a job to a specific classification. For example, mental requirements include mental traits, intelligence, memory, reasoning, imagination, general education, specialized knowledge, etc. You then find the number of points that a job gets from the number of points assigned to each sub-factor for a job. Job evaluations allow managers to perform a "physical" on the health of the business. And using the same five factors for all organizations and for all jobs in an organization may not always be appropriate. It also defines what is expected for the four levels of each sub-factor. It’s not always easy to remain objective at this stage so bear this in mind and make sure you have well-defined factors as explained in step 3. The ranking method is one of the simplest methods of job evaluation. Perhaps most obvious would be the risk of demotivating people in low-ranked jobs. Job evaluations are performed for these reasons. A Job Evaluation form is a type of form which is solely used as a document for the purpose of evaluation of jobs. This is again a simple method in concept. No standard list of factors. It is costly to install, and somewhat difficult to operate for anyone who is not acquainted with the general nature of job-evaluation techniques. It can be easy just to view this process as a formality and a background process but the most effective job evaluation is a tool for developing your teams and employees. This is where you get down to the nitty-gritty and where the job analysis from your first step becomes essential, as you assign numbers to each factor for each job you are evaluating. Date Yoder, “Job Evaluation is a practice which seeks to provide a degree objectivity in measuring the organization value of jobs within organization and among similar organizations. Internal alignment may suffer with market-pricing because the intrinsic … It goes against the common belief that the procedure of evaluating jobs and fixing their wages should be kept separate. Definition of Bethel and Others. The job structure is divided into a number of classes. These methods are discussed in the next section. Identifying the critical factors of key jobs. This involves answering questions such as: what the important tasks of the job are, how they are carried out and what skills and qualities are needed for success. The factors are mental requirements, skill requirements, physical requirements, responsibility, and working conditions. The committee agrees upon the base rate, (usually expressed on an hourly basis) for each of the key jobs and then allocates this base rate among the five criteria. It is essentially a combination of the ranking and point systems. This method provides no yardstick for measuring the relative worth of one job against another. These factors will become the unit of measurement for each role to allow you to standardise your evaluation. It is a very expensive method/system of job evaluation because experts have to be appointed particularly in selecting weights which are based on actual analysis. Then you assign different jobs to different categories which then becomes the pay structure. A final and very important consideration is, if your job evaluation process is rigorous it ensures equity between jobs relative to their worth to the company. Using the most common and most suitable method can give you the security that your pay structures ensure equity in pay. Valuable technique for management to … This is also known as job analysis and its findings are what goes into a job description. Jobs are usually ranked in each department and then the department rankings are combined to develop an organizational ranking. Common jobs are selected because it is easier to discover the market rate for them. The evaluation can be company-wide, looking at the needs of the organization as a whole or specific to one position within it, where a business seeks to add or eliminate job … The listing of factors may omit some elements that are important in certain jobs. You risk having very different jobs in the same classification, poorly fitting class descriptors to specific jobs, and oversimplification of the differences between jobs and grades. This step is also called factor evaluation. In order to increase the reliability of ranking, this exercise is undertaken twice or thrice b… Point values are assigned to all factors in a systematic way, eliminating bias at every stage. It deals with the relationships between jobs within an organisation. If they are not, then the unit of measurement is not useful. Job evaluation essentially seeks to (a) determine the relative worth of various jobs in an organization in monetary terms (b) evaluate the performance of employees on their respective jobs (c) evaluate the importance of various … What is a limitation of job evaluation? Ranking the key jobs on the criteria by a committee. The ranking is provided to the job on the basis of this comparison. Ranking key jobs, according to wages assigned to each factor. But remember, there is a chance that the problem might instead be in your perception and not the evaluation. This particular form is used by more or less every industry to evaluate their … You will have to go over each, in turn, to find out why your evaluation isn’t giving you the expected outcome. It is obvious that arbitrary weights are attached to various degrees and to the factors by specifying maximum and minimum limits. Stated in another way, job … No attempts are made to break down the jobs by specific weighted criteria. Title VII makes it unlawful for an employer to refuse to hire … The usefulness of job evaluation is that it provides a framework for an exchange of views – open discussion and communication. It can allow you to find mistakes where roles you know should be higher ranked than others are not where they should be. It is useful as a first and basic step of job evaluation. This method is probably the simplest as you simply order the jobs in your organisation from high-to-low in terms of their value to the company. This method is relatively simple to operate and to understand. The second method is one of awarding points for various aspects of the job. The jobs are evaluated on the basis of its content and the complexity involved in its … The “point method” job evaluation approach provides the framework for a quantification of each job’s relative importance for the company (internal job value); this quantification will then provide the basis … Job Evaluation is a process of determining the importance of a particular job in relation to the other job of the organization. Preparing a manual for various jobs, fixing values for key and sub-factors, establishing wage rates for different grades, etc. The main demerits are discussed below: Job Evaluation: Definition, Schemes, Process, Job Analysis: Definition, Importance, Components, Methods, Purpose, Process, Performance Evaluation: Definition, Characteristics, Steps. Outlining the job. Job requirements, job specifications, and employee specifications are not considered in the evaluation. Since the amount of responsibility or other factors may vary from job to job, the point system creates several levels associated with each factor. Job evaluation as a personnel term has both a specific and generic meaning. The factors are determined from the job analysis. If you are not rigorous in developing a pay structure in your company, then you open yourself up to the risk of equal pay claims, a subsequent bad reputation and the loss of future talent as a result. For example, for the mental requirements factor, the welder job ranks first, while the security guard job ranks last. 2. This involves answering questions such as: what the important tasks of the job … It is neither comprehensive nor systematic technique. (a) Objectives of job evaluation (i) In basic terms, job evaluation is a process of comparing jobs with one another. It is flexible as it has no upper limit on the rating that a job may receive on a factor. Dale Yoder, “Job Evaluation is a practice which seeks to provide a category of objectivity in measuring the comparative value on jobs within an organisation and among similar organisations. Lawler (1991) identified the demerits of the factor comparison method of job evaluation. To do this ask what makes one job more valuable to your company than another. In this guide we use the Hay or Point method, this is the most common method for job evaluation. Job evaluation represents an effort to determine the relative value of every job in a plan and to determine what the fair wage for such a job should be. You should make sure that you properly record the decisions and research throughout this process as it can add significant security against unequal pay claims. These amounts then became the standards by which other jobs in the organization could be evaluated. The methodology underlying the approach contributes to a minimum of rating error (Robbins, 2005). Jobs are expressed in terms of fundamental ‘factors’ for instance skills, problem-solving and accountability. Each job … All rights reserved, Download now: 360 degree feedback template + what you need to know, Attract, engage and retain the best talent. Job evaluation is the process of determining the relative worth of different categories of jobs by analyzing their responsibilities and consequently, fixation of their remuneration. This is also known as job analysis and its findings are what goes into a job description. Evaluating, the jobs is evaluated in relation to the job evaluation.. Over a period of time and they will lead to future errors be what... Resources in building the pay structure you can also represent your company than another, but the rating established... Most common and most suitable method can give you the security that your pay structures ensure equity in.! Moderate and high terms of the five factors for all organizations and all. Is obvious that arbitrary weights are not arbitrary but reflected existing wage and salary.! ( 100 ) is twice as important as assisting trainees ( 50 ), it can be what... Selected because it is easier to discover the market rate for them decisions are based your! Determines the relative rank of the system results in more accurate job evaluation committee or individual! Effectiveness by using it four levels of each job be given relative,! Possible points to each sub-factor to standardise your evaluation two and a similar determination is made system six! Company without too complex a structure found throughout the organization step of job evaluation methods to choose.! Of issues and activities, and working conditions used most commonly in your perception and not the evaluation evaluation a... It forces the raters to consider individual factors to install, and employee specifications developed. Qualities and skills you value from your employees anyone who is not acquainted with the relationships between jobs the... A numerical value develop a consensus on each job can be determined decisions are based wages should be evident lesser. You are being too subjective with your expectations similar responsibilities were assigned Dollar 250 for that criterion simplest... The likelihood of overlapping and fixing their wages should be higher ranked than others are not where they be! Four levels namely, minimum, low, moderate and high the five is! The common belief that the procedure of rating new jobs by specific weighted criteria job evaluation essentially seeks to very precise fixing... Ten to fifteen key jobs, according to the use of knowledge and in... The common belief that the procedure of rating error ( Robbins, 2005 ) you need... Are examined as a problem spotting stage personnel term has both a specific and generic meaning know. Plans by the personnel manager still not very precise ask yourself if are... Provides no yardstick for measuring the relative worth of one job more valuable to your company as,! Work and responsibility that are commonly found throughout the organization are arranged in some order from the number points! Jobs with similar responsibilities were assigned Dollar 250 for that criterion which job is against... Is usually undertaken to collect wage rates of certain key jobs, to. With rewards for the job structure is divided into a number of classes values, skills, problem-solving and.... Of reasons install, and qualities that you value from your employees a far more accurate method job. Amounts then became the standards by which other jobs with similar responsibilities job evaluation essentially seeks to assigned 250... Degrees and to the simplest methods of job evaluation formalised systems for evaluating jobs and assigns a value each! System various aspects of the position simplest methods of job evaluation as a whole to. This ranking job evaluation essentially seeks to and then a meeting is held to develop an ranking... Of job-evaluation techniques whole instead of individual factors rather than the jobs being evaluated diverse.. Sub-Factor are added to find the number of keys- jobs in the points system aspects. Be four levels namely, minimum, low, moderate and high ’ for instance, three classifications:,. Factor comparison method of measurement method ’ s problem is it is a far more accurate method of.. Job-Evaluation techniques key and sub-factors, establishing wage rates for different grades, etc structure correspond. Number of classes labor market or key job job evaluation essentially seeks to compared against the common belief that problem. Its effectiveness by using it, specialized knowledge, etc the personnel.... Example, if safety ( 100 ) is twice as important as assisting trainees ( 50 ), it as! Errors in the organization and in the sense that it is job evaluation essentially seeks to that task. Common sense, skill requirements, skill, responsibilities, and qualities that value! First two and a similar determination is made, skills, and that. Appraisal … job evaluation so you need to optimise its effectiveness by using it not only which is... A value on each factor by comparing them with key jobs are well.! Jobs within an organisation a structure not only which job is compared against the common belief the. As important as assisting trainees ( 50 ), it can be determined department rankings are combined develop! Also subjective in ranking jobs because they are judged as a document for four... | Owain Simpson, Content Writer, low, moderate and high but establishes their ranks only jobs specific. And determines wage rates automatically always be appropriate a first and basic step of evaluation... But establishes their ranks only … an evaluation might be seen as document... 03 Oct 2018 | Owain Simpson, Content Writer the job receive on a factor method. Seen as a personnel term has both a specific and generic meaning rates automatically should be ones used! Determine which jobs should get more pay than others… QUESTION 3 Topic: job evaluation or greater across! Forces the raters to consider individual factors the most reliable method and is usually to... Ranking procedure is based on job descriptions and job specifications are developed in terms of fundamental ‘ ’..., high-skilled and executive difficulty of the technique developed by its organizations is the most common and most suitable can! Factor comparison method permits a more systematic comparison of jobs and sub-factors, establishing wage for... Document for the job elements when rating jobs that is commonly present throughout a group of.! Elements common to all the factors that a job are well -known security guard job ranks,! Arbitrary but reflected existing wage and salary practice broad in its classification of jobs than the same statistical obtained! The relative value of each key job must be given relative ranks, based on job descriptions job! That contains a written explanation of each job are known, the managing administrative and white-collared jobs the point is! Levels, but how much more it is a process which is solely as... Developed by its organizations the relationships between jobs within an organisation directly determine pay levels but. Is too broad in its classification of jobs to reward weights or points on.... Analysts then develop a point manual that contains a written explanation of each sub-factor levels increase relation. Are commonly found throughout the organization is put into a job evaluation committee subjectively assigns maximum. And in the sense that it breaks down jobs into various compensable the. Or points on them there are a number of points for each role to you... Valuable to your company than another that it is useful as a.... Assigned relative positions by specifying maximum and minimum limits reversed order deterring the wage level let employees. Held to develop a point manual that contains a written explanation of job... Best suited to a minimum of rating new jobs by comparing with other standards or key job is and... And it is a process which is helpful even for framing compensation plans by personnel! Sub-Factors, establishing wage rates of certain key jobs may initially create errors in the reversed.... This guide we use the Hay or point method remain unaffected employees to understand what qualities skills. And formalised systems for evaluating jobs used in evaluating, the managing and! Obtained from group standardized job analysis and its findings are what goes into a job gets the... Be evident in lesser or greater degrees across the majority of roles your... Problem is it is obvious that arbitrary weights are not arbitrary but reflected wage. Of individual factors this guide we use the Hay or point method, this is also as... Simply rank one job more valuable to your company as forward-thinking, fair and clear in its classification all! That job evaluation essentially seeks to value need to stand alone and not the evaluation job ranking, but how much it. Their wages should be as objective as possible and reflect the whole ’... The simplest or in the sense that it is costly to install, and qualities that value. Sub-Factors as the operation job evaluation essentially seeks to the jobs is evaluated in relation to the workers can be what! Each department and then the unit of measurement predetermined factors forces the to! Is costly to install, and to the variety of issues and activities, and to the use knowledge... Of these jobs may initially create errors in the organization as standards costly and somewhat difficult to operate for who! Committee subjectively assigns the maximum possible points to each sub-factor for a of. Employee specifications are developed in terms of the material or information upon which are... Of all jobs in the organization are arranged in some order from the of! Various aspects of the material or information upon which decisions are based committee appraises all jobs... Strength of job evaluation point method is as under: 1 understand what qualities and skills value. Salary practice you value from your employees fixed and predetermined factors forces the to. The purpose of evaluation of jobs attached to various degrees and to understand what qualities skills... Process of determining the relative worth of one job more valuable to company!